BYOBot

Automate Compliance Tracking

Attestation tracking, evidence collection, control monitoring, deadline reminders, gap reporting: describe your framework and get a portable agent spec. First build free.

Track attestations Collect evidence Monitor controls Remind on deadlines Report the gaps Review vendor risk
✍️
Attestation Tracking
Track who owes a policy sign-off, chase the stragglers, and keep a provable record of who attested and when.
📁
Evidence Collection
Gather and organize the evidence each control needs, so an audit is a review of a ready folder, not a fire drill.
👀
Control Monitoring
Check each control against its required cadence and flag the ones that are overdue or slipping, before an auditor does.
⏰
Deadline Reminders
Remind owners of upcoming attestations, reviews, and renewals, so a deadline is a heads-up instead of a miss.
🕳️
Gap Reporting
Compare your current state against the framework and produce a prioritized list of open gaps and their owners.
🔎
Vendor Risk Reviews
Summarize a vendor's security documentation against your requirements, so third-party review is fast and consistent.
Google Sheets Notion Confluence Jira Airtable Slack Gmail
💬
AI Chat Tool
Run it in any chat AI
Paste a control list or a vendor's docs into Claude, ChatGPT, or Gemini with a BYOBot spec and get back the gap report, the evidence checklist, or the review. No OAuth required.
🖥️
Browser Agent
Agent gathers the evidence
A browser agent pulls evidence and status from your tools and assembles the tracker, without a developer wiring integrations first.
⚙️
Automation Stack
Fully automated monitoring
Wire the spec into your stack so attestations, deadlines, and control checks run on a schedule and alerts land in Slack.

Build Your First Compliance Agent

Describe the framework and controls. Get a portable spec. Run it on the cadence you set.

$25 USD
S$34 SGD · 5 builds per pack · first build free
Build your compliance agent →
No account. No code. A human owns every sign-off.

Compliance is mostly bookkeeping with consequences. The controls are known, the evidence is collectable, the deadlines are on a calendar, and the attestations just need chasing. What makes it painful is that the tracking lives in a spreadsheet somebody updates when they remember, so the real state of your program is a guess until an audit forces a scramble. The tracking is repetitive and rule-bound, which is exactly the kind of work an agent keeps current without heroics.

BYOBot turns compliance tracking into a portable spec: a structured file naming the controls, the evidence each needs, the cadence, and the owners. Build the tracking spec once and run it from a chat AI, a browser agent across your tools, or your stack on a schedule. It chases attestations, checks control cadence, and reports gaps continuously, so your program's real state is visible on any given day. It pairs with the legal operations workflows and, for access and system controls, the IT manager workflows.

The boundary is important in compliance specifically: BYOBot tracks, gathers, and flags, but a human owns every attestation and sign-off. The agent tells you a control is overdue or a gap is open; a responsible person decides and signs. That keeps the accountability where regulators expect it. Start with attestation tracking and deadline reminders, since they are pure chase-work, then let evidence collection and gap reporting follow, so audit season becomes a review instead of a scramble.

BYOBot automates the tracking and evidence work of a compliance program: chasing policy attestations, collecting and organizing audit evidence, monitoring controls against their cadence, reminding owners of deadlines, reporting open gaps against a framework, and summarizing vendor security documentation. It keeps the program current and leaves every sign-off to a human.
No, and that boundary matters here. BYOBot tracks status, gathers evidence, and flags gaps, then a responsible person reviews, decides, and attests. It never signs off on a control or certifies compliance. Accountability stays with the human, which is where regulators and auditors expect it.
Attestation automation keeps a live record of who owes a sign-off, chases the people who have not completed it, and logs who attested and when. Instead of discovering at audit that a third of the team never acknowledged a policy, you keep a provable, current record with automated follow-up.
Yes. Evidence automation gathers and organizes the documentation each control requires into a ready folder, and gap reporting shows what is still open. Audit prep becomes a review of an organized package rather than a last-minute scramble to find and assemble evidence.
It works across Google Sheets, Notion, Confluence, Jira, and Airtable because the portable spec maps your controls and cadence rather than one compliance platform. It complements dedicated tools or stands in where a team is still tracking in spreadsheets.
No. Paste a control list or vendor docs into an AI chat tool for an instant result, run a browser agent that gathers evidence from your tools, or connect the spec to your automation stack for scheduled monitoring and reminders. You can start with no integration and automate over time.